Buy on Amazon
€63.66
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $749
Availability
MSRP in USD: $749
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 3950X outperforms Celeron G3930 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 3950X is 1056 days newer than Celeron G3930.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 3950X
- Performs up to 5% better in Tom Clancy’s The Division 2 than Celeron G3930 - 236 vs 225 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930 - 32 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930
- Consumes up to 51% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 3950X - 51 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 9 3950X doesn't have integrated graphics
Tom Clancy’s The Division 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Celeron G3930
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
225
95.33898305084746%
Value, €/FPS
€0.28/FPS
100%
Price, €
€63.66
100%
Value Winner
Intel BX80677G3930 Processore Celeron G3930, S 1151, Kaby Lake, Dual Core, 2 Thread, 2.9GHz, 2MB Cache, 1050MHz GPU, 51W, Argento
Buy for €63.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 186 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Ryzen 9 3950X
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
Celeron G3930
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G3930
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
608
35.68075117370892%
Multi-Core
1043
9.75130890052356%
AMD Ryzen 9 3950X | vs | Intel Celeron G3930 |
|---|---|---|
Nov 25th, 2019 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
| Ryzen 9 | Collection | Celeron |
| Matisse | Codename | Kaby Lake |
| AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 2 |
32 | Threads | 2 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
| 4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 105 W | TDP | 51 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
