Buy on Amazon
€72.66
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $499
Availability
MSRP in USD: $499
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 3900X outperforms Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 3900X is 2407 days newer than Celeron G1610.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 3900X
- Performs up to 12% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Celeron G1610 - 172 vs 154 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 24 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 3900X - 55 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 9 3900X doesn't have integrated graphics
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Intel Celeron G1610
Buy for €72.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 407 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Ryzen 9 3900X
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Celeron G1610
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G1610
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
426
25.162433549911402%
Multi-Core
739
7.436103843831757%
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X | vs | Intel Celeron G1610 |
|---|---|---|
Jul 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
| Ryzen 9 | Collection | Celeron |
| Matisse | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
| AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 2 |
24 | Threads | 2 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
| 4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 105 W | TDP | 55 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
