Buy on Amazon
€72.66
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $449
Availability
MSRP in USD: $449
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 5800X3D outperforms Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 5800X3D is 3425 days newer than Celeron G1610.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D
- Performs up to 9% better in Forza Horizon 4 than Celeron G1610 - 324 vs 296 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 16 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D - 55 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D doesn't have integrated graphics
Forza Horizon 4
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Celeron G1610
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
FPS
296
91.35802469135803%
Value, €/FPS
€0.25/FPS
100%
Price, €
€72.66
100%
Value Winner
Intel Celeron G1610
Buy for €72.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4900 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Ryzen 7 5800X3D
Desktop • Apr 20th, 2022
Celeron G1610
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G1610
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
426
20.373027259684363%
Multi-Core
739
6.745162468054035%
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D | vs | Intel Celeron G1610 |
|---|---|---|
Apr 20th, 2022 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
| Ryzen 7 | Collection | Celeron |
| Vermeer | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
| AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 2 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
| 4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 105 W | TDP | 55 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
