Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 4600HS outperforms FX-8300 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 4600HS is 2631 days newer than FX-8300.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 4600HS
- Performs up to 6% better in PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds than FX-8300 - 291 vs 274 FPS
- Consumes up to 63% less energy than AMD FX-8300 - 35 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8300 - 12 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8300 doesn't have integrated graphics
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €80.56 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 180 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Jan 6th, 2020
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 4600HS | vs | AMD FX-8300 |
---|---|---|
Jan 6th, 2020 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | FX |
Renoir | Codename | Vishera |
AMD Socket FP6 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 95 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 16.5x |
Radeon RX Vega 6 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |