Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 3600XT outperforms Ryzen Threadripper 1900X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 3600XT is 675 days newer than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3600XT
- Performs up to 6% better in No Man's Sky than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 181 vs 170 FPS
- Consumes up to 47% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 95 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 3600XT - 16 vs 12 threads
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
170
93.92265193370166%
Value, €/FPS
Price, €
€379.64
100%
Buy for €379.64 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74500 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Single-Core
1168
68.54460093896714%
Multi-Core
5794
80.22708391027416%
AMD Ryzen 5 3600XT | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X |
---|---|---|
Jul 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2017 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Matisse | Codename | Whitehaven |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
12 | Threads | 16 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 180 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |