Buy on Amazon
€72.66
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $249
Availability
MSRP in USD: $249
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 3600X outperforms Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 3600X is 2407 days newer than Celeron G1610.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3600X
- Performs up to 224% better in Marvel’s Spider-Man Remastered than Celeron G1610 - 123 vs 38 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 12 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Consumes up to 42% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 3600X - 55 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 3600X doesn't have integrated graphics
Marvel’s Spider-Man Remastered
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Intel Celeron G1610
Buy for €72.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74331 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Ryzen 5 3600X
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Celeron G1610
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G1610
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
426
25.943970767356884%
Multi-Core
739
10.557142857142857%
AMD Ryzen 5 3600X | vs | Intel Celeron G1610 |
|---|---|---|
Jul 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
| Ryzen 5 | Collection | Celeron |
| Matisse | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
| AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 2 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
| 4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 95 W | TDP | 55 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
