Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900F outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 3400G on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900F is 1277 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 5 3400G.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3400G
- Up to 77% cheaper than Core i9-13900F - €88.08 vs €386.0
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-13900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900F
- Performs up to 40% better in New World than Ryzen 5 3400G - 153 vs 109 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 3400G - 32 vs 8 threads
New World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for €88.08 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75913 minutes ago
Buy for €386 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75911 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Single-Core
1128
41.318681318681314%
Multi-Core
3619
21.017480689935535%
AMD Ryzen 5 3400G | vs | Intel Core i9-13900F |
---|---|---|
Jul 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Picasso | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 24 |
8 | Threads | 32 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
65 W | TDP | Not Available |
12 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
Radeon RX Vega 11 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |