Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900F outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 1600 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 1600 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-12900F is 1729 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 5 1600.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 1600
- Up to 85% cheaper than Core i9-12900F - €74.94 vs €484.76
- Up to 81% better value when playing Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i9-12900F - €0.45 vs €2.39 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900F
- Performs up to 22% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Ryzen 5 1600 - 203 vs 166 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 1600 - 24 vs 12 threads
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
FPS
166
81%
Value, €/FPS
€0.45/FPS
100%
Price, €
€74.94
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €74.94 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15833 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
203
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.39/FPS
18%
Price, €
€484.76
15%
FPS Winner
Buy for €484.76 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15832 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 | vs | Intel Core i9-12900F |
---|---|---|
Apr 11th, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Summit Ridge | Codename | Alder Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 16 |
12 | Threads | 24 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
65 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |