Buy on Amazon
€444
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $494
Availability
MSRP in USD: $494
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900F outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1610 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-12900F is 3319 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900F
- Performs up to 14% better in Fortnite than Celeron G1610 - 241 vs 212 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 24 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Up to 80% cheaper than Core i9-12900F - €88.88 vs €444.0
- Up to 77% better value when playing Fortnite than Core i9-12900F - €0.42 vs €1.84 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-12900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Fortnite
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Intel® Core™ i9-12900F, processore desktop, per sistemi desktop cache 30M, fino a 5,10 GHz
Buy for €444 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 95 minutes ago
Celeron G1610
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
FPS
212
87%
Value, €/FPS
€0.42/FPS
100%
Price, €
€88.88
100%
Value Winner
Intel Celeron G1610
Buy for €88.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 95 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Core i9-12900F
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Celeron G1610
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-12900F | vs | Intel Celeron G1610 |
|---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
| Core i9 | Collection | Celeron |
| Alder Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
| Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 2 |
24 | Threads | 2 |
| 2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
| 5.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| Not Available | TDP | 55 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 24.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
