Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900F outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-12900F is 3319 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900F
- Performs up to 49% better in New World than Celeron G1610 - 146 vs 98 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 24 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Up to 80% cheaper than Core i9-12900F - €72.66 vs €364.79
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-12900F doesn't have integrated graphics
New World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for €364.79 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 86 minutes ago
Buy for €72.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 87 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
426
16.778259157148483%
Multi-Core
739
5.320374370050396%
Intel Core i9-12900F | vs | Intel Celeron G1610 |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
Core i9 | Collection | Celeron |
Alder Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 2 |
24 | Threads | 2 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
5.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
Not Available | TDP | 55 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
Yes | Overclockable | No |