Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900F outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 2600 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 2600 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-12900F is 1356 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 5 2600.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900F
- Performs up to 13% better in Elden Ring than Ryzen 5 2600 - 134 vs 119 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 2600 - 24 vs 12 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2600
- Up to 81% cheaper than Core i9-12900F - €84.44 vs €444.0
- Up to 79% better value when playing Elden Ring than Core i9-12900F - €0.71 vs €3.31 per FPS
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Buy for €444 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 89 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
FPS
119
88%
Value, €/FPS
€0.71/FPS
100%
Price, €
€84.44
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €84.44 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 90 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-12900F | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 2600 |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Apr 19th, 2018 |
Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Pinnacle Ridge |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 6 |
24 | Threads | 12 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
5.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |