Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 3 3100 outperforms the cheaper FX-6300 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 3 3100 is 2740 days newer than the cheaper FX-6300.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3100
- Performs up to 108% better in Diablo IV than FX-6300 - 198 vs 95 FPS
- Up to 35% better value when playing Diablo IV than FX-6300 - €0.34 vs €0.52 per FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD FX-6300 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6300 - 8 vs 6 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-6300
- Up to 25% cheaper than Ryzen 3 3100 - €49.68 vs €66.67
Diablo IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 24th, 2020
FPS
198
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.34/FPS
100%
Price, €
€66.67
74%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €66.67 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 240 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
95
47.97979797979798%
Value, €/FPS
€0.52/FPS
65.38461538461539%
Price, €
€49.68
100%
Buy for €49.68 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 239 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 24th, 2020
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 3 3100 | vs | AMD FX-6300 |
---|---|---|
Apr 24th, 2020 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Ryzen 3 | Collection | FX |
Matisse | Codename | Vishera |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 6 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 17.5x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |