Key Differences
In short — Pentium Gold G6400 outperforms the cheaper FX-6300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Pentium Gold G6400 is 2746 days newer than the cheaper FX-6300.
Advantages of AMD FX-6300
- Up to 51% cheaper than Pentium Gold G6400 - €38.99 vs €78.9
- Up to 50% better value when playing Battlefield 1 than Pentium Gold G6400 - €0.17 vs €0.34 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium Gold G6400 - 6 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Pentium Gold G6400
- Performs up to 2% better in Battlefield 1 than FX-6300 - 234 vs 229 FPS
- Consumes up to 39% less energy than AMD FX-6300 - 58 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6300 doesn't have integrated graphics
Battlefield 1
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €38.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 136 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
234
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.34/FPS
50%
Price, €
€78.9
49%
FPS Winner
Buy for €78.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 136 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6300 | vs | Intel Pentium Gold G6400 |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
FX | Collection | Pentium Gold |
Vishera | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
6 | Threads | 4 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
95 W | TDP | 58 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
17.5x | Multiplier | 40.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |