Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10105F outperforms the cheaper FX-6300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-10105F is 3066 days newer than the cheaper FX-6300.
Advantages of AMD FX-6300
- Up to 44% cheaper than Core i3-10105F - €38.99 vs €69.02
- Up to 40% better value when playing Fortnite than Core i3-10105F - €0.18 vs €0.3 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105F
- Performs up to 7% better in Fortnite than FX-6300 - 227 vs 213 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD FX-6300 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6300 - 8 vs 6 threads
Fortnite
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Buy for €38.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 94 minutes ago
Buy for €69.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 94 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6300 | vs | Intel Core i3-10105F |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
FX | Collection | Core i3 |
Vishera | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
6 | Threads | 8 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
17.5x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |