Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10105F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-4130T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-4130T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-10105F is 2753 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-4130T.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105F
- Performs up to 25% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Core i3-4130T - 371 vs 296 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4130T - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4130T
- Up to 56% cheaper than Core i3-10105F - €30.28 vs €69.02
- Up to 47% better value when playing Counter-Strike 2 than Core i3-10105F - €0.1 vs €0.19 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i3-10105F - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-10105F doesn't have integrated graphics
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
371
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.19/FPS
52%
Price, €
€69.02
43%
FPS Winner
Buy for €69.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 52 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
FPS
296
79%
Value, €/FPS
€0.1/FPS
100%
Price, €
€30.28
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €30.28 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 53 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-10105F | vs | Intel Core i3-4130T |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2013 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i3 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4400 |
No | Overclockable | No |