Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10105F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-4590 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-4590 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-10105F is 2511 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-4590.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105F
- Performs up to 3% better in Baldur's Gate 3 than Core i5-4590 - 117 vs 114 FPS
- Consumes up to 23% less energy than Intel Core i5-4590 - 65 vs 84 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4590 - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4590
- Up to 54% cheaper than Core i3-10105F - €35.0 vs €76.36
- Up to 52% better value when playing Baldur's Gate 3 than Core i3-10105F - €0.31 vs €0.65 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-10105F doesn't have integrated graphics
Baldur's Gate 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
117
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.65/FPS
47%
Price, €
€76.36
45%
FPS Winner
Buy for €76.36 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 236 minutes ago
Buy for €35 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 237 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-10105F | vs | Intel Core i5-4590 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | May 1st, 2014 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 84 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
No | Overclockable | No |