Buy on Amazon
€30.28
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i3-4130T outperforms the cheaper FX-4100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-4100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-4130T is 690 days newer than the cheaper FX-4100.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4130T
- Performs up to 10% better in World of Warcraft than FX-4100 - 168 vs 153 FPS
- Consumes up to 63% less energy than AMD FX-4100 - 35 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-4100 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-4100
- Up to 24% cheaper than Core i3-4130T - €22.88 vs €30.28
- Up to 17% better value when playing World of Warcraft than Core i3-4130T - €0.15 vs €0.18 per FPS
World of Warcraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
CHYYAC Processore CPU Intel Core I3-4130T I3 4130T 2,9 GHz Dual-Core 3M 35W LGA 1150
Buy for €30.28 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16 minutes ago
Hegem AMD FX-Series FX4100 FX-4100 FX 4100 Processore CPU Quad-Core Quad-Thread da 3,6 GHz FD4100WMW4KGU Presa AM3+ Senza Ventola
Buy for €22.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Core i3-4130T
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
FX-4100
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-4130T | vs | AMD FX-4100 |
|---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
| Core i3 | Collection | FX |
| Haswell | Codename | Zambezi |
| Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 4 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 95 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 18.0x |
Intel HD 4400 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
