Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 3100 outperforms the more expensive Celeron G1840 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 3 3100 is 2185 days newer than the more expensive Celeron G1840.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3100
- Performs up to 5% better in Dead Space than Celeron G1840 - 152 vs 145 FPS
- Up to 8% cheaper than Celeron G1840 - €66.91 vs €72.66
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1840 - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1840
- Consumes up to 18% less energy than AMD Ryzen 3 3100 - 53 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 3 3100 doesn't have integrated graphics
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €66.91 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 73802 minutes ago
Buy for €72.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 73801 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 24th, 2020
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 3 3100 | vs | Intel Celeron G1840 |
---|---|---|
Apr 24th, 2020 | Release Date | May 1st, 2014 |
Ryzen 3 | Collection | Celeron |
Matisse | Codename | Haswell |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 53 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Haswell) |
Yes | Overclockable | No |