Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 3400G outperforms the cheaper Phenom II X4 925 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Phenom II X4 925 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 5 3400G is 3709 days newer than the cheaper Phenom II X4 925.
Advantages of AMD Phenom II X4 925
- Up to 75% cheaper than Ryzen 5 3400G - €25.22 vs €102.71
- Up to 62% better value when playing Counter-Strike 2 than Ryzen 5 3400G - €0.12 vs €0.32 per FPS
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3400G
- Performs up to 50% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Phenom II X4 925 - 326 vs 218 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD Phenom II X4 925 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Phenom II X4 925 - 8 vs 4 threads
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • May 11th, 2009
FPS
218
66.87116564417178%
Value, €/FPS
€0.12/FPS
100%
Price, €
€25.22
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €25.22 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 129 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
326
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.32/FPS
37.5%
Price, €
€102.71
24%
FPS Winner
Buy for €102.71 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 131 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • May 11th, 2009
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • May 11th, 2009
Single-Core
320
28.368794326241137%
Multi-Core
930
25.697706548770377%
AMD Phenom II X4 925 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 3400G |
---|---|---|
May 11th, 2009 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Phenom II X4 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Deneb | Codename | Picasso |
AMD Socket AM3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
14.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | Radeon RX Vega 11 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |