Key Differences
In short — Core i3-2100 outperforms the cheaper Phenom II X4 925 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Phenom II X4 925 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-2100 is 650 days newer than the cheaper Phenom II X4 925.
Advantages of AMD Phenom II X4 925
- Up to 78% cheaper than Core i3-2100 - €25.22 vs €113.23
- Up to 77% better value when playing Rust than Core i3-2100 - €0.17 vs €0.73 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i3-2100
- Performs up to 4% better in Rust than Phenom II X4 925 - 155 vs 149 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD Phenom II X4 925 - 65 vs 95 Watts
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • May 11th, 2009
FPS
149
96.12903225806451%
Value, €/FPS
€0.17/FPS
100%
Price, €
€25.22
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €25.22 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2 minutes ago
Desktop • Feb 20th, 2011
FPS
155
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.73/FPS
23.287671232876715%
Price, €
€113.23
22%
FPS Winner
Buy for €113.23 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • May 11th, 2009
Desktop • Feb 20th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • May 11th, 2009
Single-Core
320
68.6695278969957%
Multi-Core
930
97.48427672955975%
AMD Phenom II X4 925 | vs | Intel Core i3-2100 |
---|---|---|
May 11th, 2009 | Release Date | Feb 20th, 2011 |
Phenom II X4 | Collection | Core i3 |
Deneb | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
AMD Socket AM3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
14.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2000 |
No | Overclockable | No |