Buy on Amazon
€50.95
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $169
Availability
MSRP in USD: $169
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — FX-8320 outperforms Celeron G3930 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing FX-8320 is 1533 days older than Celeron G3930.
Advantages of AMD FX-8320
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930 - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930
- Consumes up to 59% less energy than AMD FX-8320 - 51 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8320 doesn't have integrated graphics
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Celeron G3930
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
167
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.31/FPS
100%
Price, €
€50.95
100%
Value Winner
Intel BX80677G3930 Processore Celeron G3930, S 1151, Kaby Lake, Dual Core, 2 Thread, 2.9GHz, 2MB Cache, 1050MHz GPU, 51W, Argento
Buy for €50.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 223 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
FX-8320
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Celeron G3930
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8320 | vs | Intel Celeron G3930 |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
| FX | Collection | Celeron |
| Vishera | Codename | Kaby Lake |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
| 3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 125 W | TDP | 51 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 17.5x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
