Buy on Amazon
€9.9
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $169
Availability
MSRP in USD: $169
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Celeron G1840 outperforms FX-8320 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G1840 is 555 days newer than FX-8320.
Advantages of AMD FX-8320
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1840 - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1840
- Performs up to 2% better in F1 23 than FX-8320 - 151 vs 148 FPS
- Consumes up to 58% less energy than AMD FX-8320 - 53 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8320 doesn't have integrated graphics
F1 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Celeron G1840
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
FPS
151
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.07/FPS
100%
Price, €
€9.9
100%
FPS and Value Winner
BQTEC Intel Celeron G1840 2.80 GHz Dual-Core Dual-Thread 3 MB Cache 53 W CPU Processore Socket LGA 1150
Buy for €9.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 387 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
FX-8320
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Celeron G1840
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8320 | vs | Intel Celeron G1840 |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | May 1st, 2014 |
| FX | Collection | Celeron |
| Vishera | Codename | Haswell |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
| 3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 125 W | TDP | 53 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 17.5x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Haswell) |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
