Buy on Amazon
€78.7
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $52
Availability
MSRP in USD: $52
Key Differences
In short — Celeron G6900 outperforms EPYC 7742 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G6900 is 881 days newer than EPYC 7742.
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7742
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 128 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G6900
- Performs up to 6% better in Sea of Thieves than EPYC 7742 - 242 vs 229 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7742 doesn't have integrated graphics
Sea of Thieves
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Mythical
Celeron G6900
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
242
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.33/FPS
100%
Price, €
€78.7
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel® Celeron® G6900, processore desktop, per sistemi desktop
Buy for €78.7 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 104 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Mythical
EPYC 7742
Server/Workstation • Aug 7th, 2019
Celeron G6900
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD EPYC 7742 | vs | Intel Celeron G6900 |
|---|---|---|
| Aug 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
| EPYC | Collection | Celeron |
| Rome | Codename | Alder Lake |
| AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
64 | Cores | 2 |
128 | Threads | 2 |
| 2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
| 3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 225 W | TDP | Not Available |
7 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
| 22.5x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 710 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
