Buy on Amazon
€60.9
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — EPYC 7742 outperforms Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing EPYC 7742 is 1436 days newer than Celeron G3900.
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7742
- Performs up to 3% better in ARK: Survival Evolved than Celeron G3900 - 121 vs 117 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 128 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Consumes up to 77% less energy than AMD EPYC 7742 - 51 vs 225 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7742 doesn't have integrated graphics
ARK: Survival Evolved
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Celeron G3900
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
117
96%
Value, €/FPS
€0.52/FPS
100%
Price, €
€60.9
100%
Value Winner
Intel Celeron g3900 2,80 gHz LGA1151 2 MB Cache Tray
Buy for €60.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 25 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
EPYC 7742
Server/Workstation • Aug 7th, 2019
Celeron G3900
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD EPYC 7742 | vs | Intel Celeron G3900 |
|---|---|---|
Aug 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
| EPYC | Collection | Celeron |
| Rome | Codename | Skylake |
| AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
64 | Cores | 2 |
128 | Threads | 2 |
| 2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
| 3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 225 W | TDP | 51 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 22.5x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
