Buy on Amazon
€88.88
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — EPYC 7742 outperforms Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing EPYC 7742 is 2438 days newer than Celeron G1610.
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7742
- Performs up to 13% better in Horizon Zero Dawn than Celeron G1610 - 170 vs 151 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 128 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Consumes up to 76% less energy than AMD EPYC 7742 - 55 vs 225 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7742 doesn't have integrated graphics
Horizon Zero Dawn
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultimate
Celeron G1610
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
FPS
151
88%
Value, €/FPS
€0.59/FPS
100%
Price, €
€88.88
100%
Value Winner
Intel Celeron G1610
Buy for €88.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 47 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultimate
EPYC 7742
Server/Workstation • Aug 7th, 2019
Celeron G1610
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD EPYC 7742 | vs | Intel Celeron G1610 |
|---|---|---|
Aug 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
| EPYC | Collection | Celeron |
| Rome | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
| AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
64 | Cores | 2 |
128 | Threads | 2 |
| 2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
| 3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 225 W | TDP | 55 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 22.5x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
