Key Differences
In short — Celeron G6900 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-9100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-9100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Celeron G6900 is 1221 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-9100.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G6900
- Performs up to 2% better in Elden Ring than Core i3-9100 - 124 vs 121 FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i3-9100
- Up to 24% cheaper than Celeron G6900 - €59.99 vs €78.7
- Up to 21% better value when playing Elden Ring than Celeron G6900 - €0.5 vs €0.63 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Buy for €78.7 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 62 minutes ago
Buy for €59.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 63 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G6900 | vs | Intel Core i3-9100 |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2018 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i3 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
UHD Graphics 710 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |