Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Celeron G6900 outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 2600 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Celeron G6900 is 1356 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 5 2600.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G6900
- Performs up to 4% better in Overwatch 2 than Ryzen 5 2600 - 355 vs 341 FPS
- Up to 4% better value when playing Overwatch 2 than Ryzen 5 2600 - €0.22 vs €0.23 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 2600 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2600
- Up to 0% cheaper than Celeron G6900 - €78.54 vs €78.7
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 12 vs 2 threads
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
355
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.22/FPS
100%
Price, €
€78.7
99%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €78.7 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 132 minutes ago
Buy for €78.54 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 133 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G6900 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 2600 |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Apr 19th, 2018 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Pinnacle Ridge |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 12 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
UHD Graphics 710 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |