Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900X outperforms Athlon 3000G on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900X is 32 days older than Athlon 3000G.
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Consumes up to 79% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900X - 35 vs 165 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900X
- Performs up to 4% better in Baldur's Gate 3 than Athlon 3000G - 118 vs 113 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Athlon 3000G - 20 vs 4 threads
Baldur's Gate 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
FPS
113
95%
Value, €/FPS
€0.92/FPS
100%
Price, €
€103.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €103.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 114 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Athlon 3000G | vs | Intel Core i9-10900X |
---|---|---|
Nov 20th, 2019 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2019 |
Athlon | Collection | Core i9 Extreme |
Picasso | Codename | Cascade Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 10 |
4 | Threads | 20 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 165 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Radeon Vega 3 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |