Key Differences
In short — Athlon 3000G outperforms Core i3-3250 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Athlon 3000G is 2355 days newer than Core i3-3250.
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Performs up to 9% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i3-3250 - 99 vs 91 FPS
- Consumes up to 36% less energy than Intel Core i3-3250 - 35 vs 55 Watts
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
FPS
99
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.83/FPS
100%
Price, €
€82.24
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €82.24 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17932 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Desktop • Jun 9th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Athlon 3000G | vs | Intel Core i3-3250 |
---|---|---|
Nov 20th, 2019 | Release Date | Jun 9th, 2013 |
Athlon | Collection | Core i3 |
Picasso | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
35 W | TDP | 55 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Radeon Vega 3 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |