Key Differences
In short — Celeron G6900 outperforms Core i3-3250 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G6900 is 3131 days newer than Core i3-3250.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3250
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G6900
- Performs up to 22% better in Far Cry 3 than Core i3-3250 - 149 vs 122 FPS
Far Cry 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
149
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.53/FPS
100%
Price, €
€78.8
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €78.8 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15397 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 9th, 2013
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-3250 | vs | Intel Celeron G6900 |
---|---|---|
Jun 9th, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Core i3 | Collection | Celeron |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
55 W | TDP | Not Available |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 710 |
No | Overclockable | No |