Buy on Amazon
€78.7
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $52
Availability
MSRP in USD: $52
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Celeron G6900 outperforms the more expensive Core i5-7400 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Celeron G6900 is 1827 days newer than the more expensive Core i5-7400.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G6900
- Performs up to 8% better in Grand Theft Auto V than Core i5-7400 - 134 vs 124 FPS
- Up to 61% cheaper than Core i5-7400 - €78.7 vs €202.91
- Up to 64% better value when playing Grand Theft Auto V than Core i5-7400 - €0.59 vs €1.64 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i5-7400
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Grand Theft Auto V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Celeron G6900
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
134
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.59/FPS
100%
Price, €
€78.7
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel® Celeron® G6900, processore desktop, per sistemi desktop
Buy for €78.7 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8 minutes ago
Intel BX80677I57400 - Processore Core i5-7400 3GHz 6MB Smart Cache Box (BX80677I57400)
Buy for €202.91 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Celeron G6900
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Core i5-7400
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G6900 | vs | Intel Core i5-7400 |
|---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
| Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
| Alder Lake | Codename | Kaby Lake |
| Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 2 | Threads | 4 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| Not Available | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
| UHD Graphics 710 | Integrated Graphics | HD 630 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
