Key Differences
In short — Core i3-14100F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-7400 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-7400 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-14100F is 2561 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-7400.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-7400
- Up to 58% cheaper than Core i3-14100F - €67.44 vs €161.92
- Up to 50% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i3-14100F - €0.53 vs €1.06 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-14100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i3-14100F
- Performs up to 20% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i5-7400 - 153 vs 127 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-7400 - 8 vs 4 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
127
83%
Value, €/FPS
€0.53/FPS
100%
Price, €
€67.44
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €67.44 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14123 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
153
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.06/FPS
50%
Price, €
€161.92
41%
FPS Winner
Buy for €161.92 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14122 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-7400 | vs | Intel Core i3-14100F |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
65 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |