Key Differences
In short — Radeon R5 230 outperforms GeForce GTX 1650 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon R5 230 is 1846 days older than GeForce GTX 1650.
Advantages of AMD Radeon R5 230
- Performs up to 124% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than GeForce GTX 1650 - 76 vs 34 FPS
- Consumes up to 75% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 - 19 vs 75 Watts
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
- Up to 300% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon R5 230 - 4 vs 1 GB
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for €189.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 106 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2014
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2014
Pixel Fillrate
2.5 GPixel/s
4.692192192192192%
Texel Fillrate
5 GTexel/s
5.362505362505362%
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Pixel Fillrate
53.28 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
93.24 GTexel/s
100%
AMD Radeon R5 230 | vs | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2014 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
Volcanic Islands | Generation | GeForce 16 |
Not Available | MSRP | $149 |
1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
None | Power Connectors | None |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
1 GB | Memory | 4 GB |
DDR3 | Type | GDDR5 |
64-bit | Bus | 128-bit |
10.67 GB/s | Bandwidth | 128.1 GB/s |
625 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1485 MHz |
Not Available | Boost Clock Speed | 1665 MHz |
667 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 2001 MHz |