Key Differences
In short — Arc A750 outperforms the cheaper GeForce GTX 1650 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing GeForce GTX 1650 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Arc A750 is 1268 days newer than the cheaper GeForce GTX 1650.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
- Up to 38% cheaper than Arc A750 - €152.48 vs €247.65
- Up to 0% better value when playing The Callisto Protocol than Arc A750 - €2.28 vs €2.29 per FPS
- Consumes up to 67% less energy than Intel Arc A750 - 75 vs 225 Watts
Advantages of Intel Arc A750
- Performs up to 61% better in The Callisto Protocol than GeForce GTX 1650 - 108 vs 67 FPS
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 - 8 vs 4 GB
The Callisto Protocol
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
67
62%
Value, €/FPS
€2.28/FPS
100%
Price, €
€152.48
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €152.48 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17499 minutes ago
Buy for €247.65 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17050 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2022
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Pixel Fillrate
53.28 GPixel/s
19%
Texel Fillrate
93.24 GTexel/s
17%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 | vs | Intel Arc A750 |
---|---|---|
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2022 |
GeForce 16 | Generation | Alchemist |
$149 | MSRP | $289 |
1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | Outputs | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 2.0 |
None | Power Connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 GB | Memory | 8 GB |
GDDR5 | Type | GDDR6 |
128-bit | Bus | 256-bit |
128.1 GB/s | Bandwidth | 512 GB/s |
1485 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 2050 MHz |
1665 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 2400 MHz |
2001 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 2000 MHz |