Key Differences
In short — Arc A750 outperforms the cheaper GeForce GTX 1650 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Arc A750 is 1268 days newer than the cheaper GeForce GTX 1650.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
- Up to 29% cheaper than Arc A750 - €162.0 vs €227.0
- Consumes up to 67% less energy than Intel Arc A750 - 75 vs 225 Watts
Advantages of Intel Arc A750
- Performs up to 47% better in FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker than GeForce GTX 1650 - 181 vs 123 FPS
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 - 8 vs 4 GB
FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Buy for €162 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77951 minutes ago
Buy for €227 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77950 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2022
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Pixel Fillrate
53.28 GPixel/s
19.82142857142857%
Texel Fillrate
93.24 GTexel/s
17.34375%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 | vs | Intel Arc A750 |
---|---|---|
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2022 |
GeForce 16 | Generation | Alchemist |
$149 | MSRP | $289 |
1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | Outputs | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 2.0 |
None | Power Connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 GB | Memory | 8 GB |
GDDR5 | Type | GDDR6 |
128-bit | Bus | 256-bit |
128.1 GB/s | Bandwidth | 512 GB/s |
1485 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 2050 MHz |
1665 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 2400 MHz |
2001 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 2000 MHz |