Key Differences
In short — Arc A750 outperforms the cheaper Radeon Pro WX 3200 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Radeon Pro WX 3200 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Arc A750 is 1198 days newer than the cheaper Radeon Pro WX 3200.
Advantages of Intel Arc A750
- Performs up to 46% better in Valorant than Radeon Pro WX 3200 - 754 vs 515 FPS
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 - 8 vs 4 GB
Advantages of AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200
- Up to 47% cheaper than Arc A750 - €138.28 vs €261.45
- Up to 23% better value when playing Valorant than Arc A750 - €0.27 vs €0.35 per FPS
- Consumes up to 71% less energy than Intel Arc A750 - 65 vs 225 Watts
Valorant
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for €261.45 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 183 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2019
FPS
515
68%
Value, €/FPS
€0.27/FPS
100%
Price, €
€138.28
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €138.28 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 184 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2022
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2019
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2019
Pixel Fillrate
20.72 GPixel/s
7%
Texel Fillrate
41.44 GTexel/s
7%
Intel Arc A750 | vs | AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2022 | Release Date | Jul 2nd, 2019 |
Alchemist | Generation | Radeon Pro |
$289 | MSRP | $199 |
1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 2.0 | Outputs | 4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a |
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | Power Connectors | None |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 GB | Memory | 4 GB |
GDDR6 | Type | GDDR5 |
256-bit | Bus | 128-bit |
512 GB/s | Bandwidth | 96 GB/s |
2050 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1295 MHz |
2400 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
2000 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1500 MHz |