Key Differences
In short — GeForce GTX 1650 outperforms the cheaper Radeon Pro WX 3200 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing GeForce GTX 1650 is 70 days older than the cheaper Radeon Pro WX 3200.
Advantages of AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200
- Up to 17% cheaper than GeForce GTX 1650 - €134.0 vs €162.0
- Consumes up to 13% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 - 65 vs 75 Watts
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
- Performs up to 30% better in Deathloop than Radeon Pro WX 3200 - 61 vs 47 FPS
Deathloop
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €134 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74228 minutes ago
Buy for €162 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74227 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2019
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2019
Pixel Fillrate
20.72 GPixel/s
38.888888888888886%
Texel Fillrate
41.44 GTexel/s
44.44444444444444%
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Pixel Fillrate
53.28 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
93.24 GTexel/s
100%
AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 | vs | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 |
---|---|---|
Jul 2nd, 2019 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
Radeon Pro | Generation | GeForce 16 |
$199 | MSRP | $149 |
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
None | Power Connectors | None |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 GB | Memory | 4 GB |
GDDR5 | Type | GDDR5 |
128-bit | Bus | 128-bit |
96 GB/s | Bandwidth | 128.1 GB/s |
1295 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1485 MHz |
Not Available | Boost Clock Speed | 1665 MHz |
1500 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 2001 MHz |