Key Differences
In short — GeForce GTX 1650 outperforms the cheaper Radeon RX 6400 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Radeon RX 6400 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing GeForce GTX 1650 is 1002 days older than the cheaper Radeon RX 6400.
Advantages of AMD Radeon RX 6400
- Up to 6% cheaper than GeForce GTX 1650 - €143.18 vs €152.48
- Up to 6% better value when playing The Last of Us Part I than GeForce GTX 1650 - €4.62 vs €4.92 per FPS
- Consumes up to 29% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 - 53 vs 75 Watts
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €152.48 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4656 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 19th, 2022
FPS
31
100%
Value, €/FPS
€4.62/FPS
100%
Price, €
€143.18
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €143.18 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4655 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Desktop • Jan 19th, 2022
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Pixel Fillrate
53.28 GPixel/s
71%
Texel Fillrate
93.24 GTexel/s
83%
Desktop • Jan 19th, 2022
Pixel Fillrate
74.27 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
111.4 GTexel/s
100%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 | vs | AMD Radeon RX 6400 |
---|---|---|
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Jan 19th, 2022 |
GeForce 16 | Generation | Navi II |
$149 | MSRP | $159 |
1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | Outputs | 1x HDMI 2.1, 1x DisplayPort 1.4a |
None | Power Connectors | None |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 GB | Memory | 4 GB |
GDDR5 | Type | GDDR6 |
128-bit | Bus | 64-bit |
128.1 GB/s | Bandwidth | 128 GB/s |
1485 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1923 MHz |
1665 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 2321 MHz |
2001 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 2000 MHz |