Key Differences
In short — Radeon RX 6400 outperforms the more expensive GeForce GTX 1650 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon RX 6400 is 1002 days newer than the more expensive GeForce GTX 1650.
Advantages of AMD Radeon RX 6400
- Performs up to 2% better in Dead Space than GeForce GTX 1650 - 53 vs 52 FPS
- Up to 2% cheaper than GeForce GTX 1650 - €159.0 vs €162.0
- Consumes up to 29% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 - 53 vs 75 Watts
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €162 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 73910 minutes ago
Buy for €159 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 73909 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Desktop • Jan 19th, 2022
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Pixel Fillrate
53.28 GPixel/s
71.73825232260671%
Texel Fillrate
93.24 GTexel/s
83.69838420107719%
Desktop • Jan 19th, 2022
Pixel Fillrate
74.27 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
111.4 GTexel/s
100%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 | vs | AMD Radeon RX 6400 |
---|---|---|
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Jan 19th, 2022 |
GeForce 16 | Generation | Navi II |
$149 | MSRP | $159 |
1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | Outputs | 1x HDMI 2.1, 1x DisplayPort 1.4a |
None | Power Connectors | None |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 GB | Memory | 4 GB |
GDDR5 | Type | GDDR6 |
128-bit | Bus | 64-bit |
128.1 GB/s | Bandwidth | 128 GB/s |
1485 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1923 MHz |
1665 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 2321 MHz |
2001 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 2000 MHz |