Key Differences
In short — Radeon R5 230 outperforms Radeon Pro WX 2100 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon R5 230 is 1158 days older than Radeon Pro WX 2100.
Advantages of AMD Radeon R5 230
- Performs up to 47% better in Rust than Radeon Pro WX 2100 - 126 vs 86 FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100 - 19 vs 35 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon R5 230 - 2 vs 1 GB
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Currently N/A on Amazon
Out of Stock
Updated 67313 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2014
Desktop • Jun 4th, 2017
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2014
Pixel Fillrate
2.5 GPixel/s
12.82051282051282%
Texel Fillrate
5 GTexel/s
12.817226352217382%
Desktop • Jun 4th, 2017
Pixel Fillrate
19.5 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
39.01 GTexel/s
100%
AMD Radeon R5 230 | vs | AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100 |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2014 | Release Date | Jun 4th, 2017 |
Volcanic Islands | Generation | Radeon Pro |
Not Available | MSRP | $149 |
1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | Outputs | 1x DisplayPort, 2x mini-DisplayPort |
None | Power Connectors | None |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
1 GB | Memory | 2 GB |
DDR3 | Type | GDDR5 |
64-bit | Bus | 64-bit |
10.67 GB/s | Bandwidth | 48 GB/s |
625 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 925 MHz |
Not Available | Boost Clock Speed | 1219 MHz |
667 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1500 MHz |