Key Differences
In short — Radeon R5 230 outperforms Radeon RX 6400 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon R5 230 is 2848 days older than Radeon RX 6400.
Advantages of AMD Radeon R5 230
- Performs up to 75% better in Starfield than Radeon RX 6400 - 35 vs 20 FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Radeon RX 6400 - 19 vs 53 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon RX 6400
- Up to 300% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon R5 230 - 4 vs 1 GB
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 19th, 2022
FPS
20
57.14285714285714%
Value, €/FPS
€8.8/FPS
100%
Price, €
€176
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €176 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 178 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2014
Desktop • Jan 19th, 2022
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2014
Pixel Fillrate
2.5 GPixel/s
3.3660966742964855%
Texel Fillrate
5 GTexel/s
4.488330341113106%
Desktop • Jan 19th, 2022
Pixel Fillrate
74.27 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
111.4 GTexel/s
100%
AMD Radeon R5 230 | vs | AMD Radeon RX 6400 |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2014 | Release Date | Jan 19th, 2022 |
Volcanic Islands | Generation | Navi II |
Not Available | MSRP | $159 |
1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | Outputs | 1x HDMI 2.1, 1x DisplayPort 1.4a |
None | Power Connectors | None |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
1 GB | Memory | 4 GB |
DDR3 | Type | GDDR6 |
64-bit | Bus | 64-bit |
10.67 GB/s | Bandwidth | 128 GB/s |
625 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1923 MHz |
Not Available | Boost Clock Speed | 2321 MHz |
667 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 2000 MHz |