Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900KF outperforms Xeon E5-2699A v4 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-12900KF is 1836 days newer than Xeon E5-2699A v4.
Advantages of Xeon E5-2699A v4
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-12900KF - 44 vs 24 threads
Advantages of Core i9-12900KF
- Performs up to 17% better in FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker than Xeon E5-2699A v4 - 284 vs 242 FPS
- Consumes up to 14% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 - 125 vs 145 Watts
FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
284
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.9/FPS
100%
Price, £
£257.02
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £257.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7180 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Oct 25th, 2016
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E5-2699A v4 | vs | Core i9-12900KF |
---|---|---|
Oct 25th, 2016 | Release Date | Nov 4th, 2021 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Broadwell | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
22 | Cores | 16 |
44 | Threads | 24 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
145 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |