Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900KF outperforms the cheaper Core i3-12100F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-12100F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-12900KF is 82 days older than the cheaper Core i3-12100F.
Advantages of Core i9-12900KF
- Performs up to 4% better in Overwatch 2 than Core i3-12100F - 394 vs 379 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-12100F - 24 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Core i3-12100F
- Up to 73% cheaper than Core i9-12900KF - £70.00 vs £260.26
- Up to 73% better value when playing Overwatch 2 than Core i9-12900KF - £0.18 vs £0.66 per FPS
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Core i9-12900KF - 58 vs 125 Watts
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
394
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.66/FPS
27%
Price, £
£260.26
26%
FPS Winner
Buy for £260.26 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 544 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
FPS
379
96%
Value, £/FPS
£0.18/FPS
100%
Price, £
£70
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £70 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 544 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i9-12900KF | vs | Core i3-12100F |
---|---|---|
Nov 4th, 2021 | Release Date | Jan 25th, 2022 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i3 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 4 |
24 | Threads | 8 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 58 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |