Key Differences
In short — Core i7-13700K outperforms Xeon E5-2699A v4 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-13700K is 2163 days newer than Xeon E5-2699A v4.
Advantages of Xeon E5-2699A v4
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-13700K - 44 vs 24 threads
Advantages of Core i7-13700K
- Performs up to 23% better in Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than Xeon E5-2699A v4 - 270 vs 220 FPS
- Consumes up to 14% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 - 125 vs 145 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
270
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.28/FPS
100%
Price, £
£346.39
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £346.39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 53 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Oct 25th, 2016
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E5-2699A v4 | vs | Core i7-13700K |
---|---|---|
Oct 25th, 2016 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Broadwell | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
22 | Cores | 16 |
44 | Threads | 24 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.4 GHz |
145 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |