Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900KF outperforms Xeon E5-2699A v4 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-14900KF is 2548 days newer than Xeon E5-2699A v4.
Advantages of Xeon E5-2699A v4
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-14900KF - 44 vs 32 threads
Advantages of Core i9-14900KF
- Performs up to 13% better in Monster Hunter: World than Xeon E5-2699A v4 - 289 vs 255 FPS
Monster Hunter: World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Xeon E5-2699A v4
Desktop • Oct 25th, 2016
Core i9-14900KF
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E5-2699A v4 | vs | Core i9-14900KF |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 25th, 2016 | Release Date | Oct 17th, 2023 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i9 |
| Broadwell | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 22 | Cores | 24 |
44 | Threads | 32 |
| 2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
| 3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
| 145 W | TDP | Not Available |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
| 24.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
