Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900K outperforms the cheaper Core i9-12900KF on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i9-12900KF is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900K is 712 days newer than the cheaper Core i9-12900KF.
Advantages of Core i9-12900KF
- Up to 40% cheaper than Core i9-14900K - £260.26 vs £432.97
- Up to 38% better value when playing Battlefield 1 than Core i9-14900K - £1.01 vs £1.63 per FPS
Advantages of Core i9-14900K
- Performs up to 3% better in Battlefield 1 than Core i9-12900KF - 265 vs 258 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-12900KF - 32 vs 24 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-12900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Battlefield 1
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
258
97%
Value, £/FPS
£1.01/FPS
100%
Price, £
£260.26
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £260.26 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 531 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FPS
265
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.63/FPS
62%
Price, £
£432.97
60%
FPS Winner
Buy for £432.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 531 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i9-12900KF | vs | Core i9-14900K |
---|---|---|
Nov 4th, 2021 | Release Date | Oct 17th, 2023 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i9 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 24 |
24 | Threads | 32 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
125 W | TDP | Not Available |
10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |