Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i9-12900KF outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1920X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i9-12900KF is 1547 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1920X.
Advantages of Core i9-12900KF
- Performs up to 15% better in Overwatch 2 than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 394 vs 344 FPS
- Up to 23% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - £257.13 vs £334.87
- Up to 33% better value when playing Overwatch 2 than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - £0.65 vs £0.97 per FPS
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 125 vs 180 Watts
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
344
87%
Value, £/FPS
£0.97/FPS
67%
Price, £
£334.87
76%
Buy for £334.87 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 303 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
394
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.65/FPS
100%
Price, £
£257.13
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £257.13 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 302 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen Threadripper 1920X | vs | Core i9-12900KF |
---|---|---|
Aug 10th, 2017 | Release Date | Nov 4th, 2021 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i9 |
Whitehaven | Codename | Alder Lake |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 16 |
24 | Threads | 24 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |