Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i9-12900K outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1920X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i9-12900K is 1547 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1920X.
Advantages of Core i9-12900K
- Performs up to 35% better in New World than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 149 vs 110 FPS
- Up to 2% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - £328.01 vs £334.87
- Up to 28% better value when playing New World than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - £2.20 vs £3.04 per FPS
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 125 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X doesn't have integrated graphics
New World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
110
74%
Value, £/FPS
£3.04/FPS
72%
Price, £
£334.87
97%
Buy for £334.87 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 296 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
149
100%
Value, £/FPS
£2.2/FPS
100%
Price, £
£328.01
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £328.01 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 296 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen Threadripper 1920X | vs | Core i9-12900K |
---|---|---|
Aug 10th, 2017 | Release Date | Nov 4th, 2021 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i9 |
Whitehaven | Codename | Alder Lake |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 16 |
24 | Threads | 24 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |