Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 7 3700X outperforms the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1920X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 7 3700X is 696 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1920X.
Advantages of Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
- Up to 5% cheaper than Ryzen 7 3700X - £334.87 vs £354.25
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 7 3700X - 24 vs 16 threads
Advantages of Ryzen 7 3700X
- Performs up to 8% better in World of Warcraft than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 192 vs 178 FPS
- Up to 2% better value when playing World of Warcraft than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - £1.85 vs £1.88 per FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 65 vs 180 Watts
World of Warcraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
178
93%
Value, £/FPS
£1.88/FPS
98%
Price, £
£334.87
100%
Buy for £334.87 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 286 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
192
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.85/FPS
100%
Price, £
£354.25
94%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £354.25 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 286 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen Threadripper 1920X | vs | Ryzen 7 3700X |
---|---|---|
Aug 10th, 2017 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Whitehaven | Codename | Matisse |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 8 |
24 | Threads | 16 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |