Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-12600K outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1920X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-12600K is 1547 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1920X.
Advantages of Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-12600K - 24 vs 16 threads
Advantages of Core i5-12600K
- Performs up to 6% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 189 vs 178 FPS
- Up to 29% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - £238.62 vs £334.87
- Up to 33% better value when playing Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - £1.26 vs £1.88 per FPS
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 125 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
178
94%
Value, £/FPS
£1.88/FPS
67%
Price, £
£334.87
71%
Buy for £334.87 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 297 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
189
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.26/FPS
100%
Price, £
£238.62
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £238.62 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 296 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen Threadripper 1920X | vs | Core i5-12600K |
---|---|---|
Aug 10th, 2017 | Release Date | Nov 4th, 2021 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i5 |
Whitehaven | Codename | Alder Lake |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 10 |
24 | Threads | 16 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |