Key Differences
In short — Core i5-12600K outperforms Core i5-13400F on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-12600K is 426 days older than Core i5-13400F.
Advantages of Core i5-12600K
- Performs up to 2% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i5-13400F - 210 vs 206 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-13400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
210
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.13/FPS
100%
Price, £
£236.83
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £236.83 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6315 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-12600K | vs | Core i5-13400F |
---|---|---|
Nov 4th, 2021 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 10 |
16 | Threads | 16 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
125 W | TDP | Not Available |
10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |