Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2920X outperforms Xeon E5620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2920X is 3123 days newer than Xeon E5620.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5620
- Consumes up to 56% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 80 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Performs up to 10% better in Escape From Tarkov than Xeon E5620 - 205 vs 187 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5620 - 24 vs 8 threads
Escape From Tarkov
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
FPS
205
100%
Value, £/FPS
£2.93/FPS
100%
Price, £
£599.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £599.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 262 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Mar 16th, 2010
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5620 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2010 | Release Date | Oct 3rd, 2018 |
Xeon | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Westmere-EP | Codename | Colfax |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 12 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
2.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 180 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |