Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900X outperforms Xeon E5620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900X is 3504 days newer than Xeon E5620.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5620
- Consumes up to 52% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900X - 80 vs 165 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900X
- Performs up to 4% better in Monster Hunter: World than Xeon E5620 - 259 vs 250 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5620 - 20 vs 8 threads
Monster Hunter: World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
FPS
259
100%
Value, £/FPS
£2.18/FPS
100%
Price, £
£565
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £565 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8353 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Server/Workstation • Mar 16th, 2010
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5620 | vs | Intel Core i9-10900X |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2010 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2019 |
Xeon | Collection | Core i9 Extreme |
Westmere-EP | Codename | Cascade Lake |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
8 | Threads | 20 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
2.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 165 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |